Can a Two-Tailed Dog Be Allowed Into the Polling Booth? : The Case of Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt Versus Hungary Before the ECtHR.

Papp János Tamás: Can a Two-Tailed Dog Be Allowed Into the Polling Booth? : The Case of Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt Versus Hungary Before the ECtHR.
HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW, 9 (1). pp. 400-407. ISSN 2666-2701 (2021)

[thumbnail of Papp_Can_a_Two-Tailed_Dog_Be_Allowed_Into_the_Polling_Booth.pdf]

Szöveg
Papp_Can_a_Two-Tailed_Dog_Be_Allowed_Into_the_Polling_Booth.pdf - Megjelent verzió
Download (307kB)

Mű típusa:

Folyóiratcikk

Szerző azonosítók:

Név	ORCID	MTMT szerző azonosító
Papp János Tamás	0000-0001-8682-6900	10054193

Absztrakt (kivonat):

The Hungarian satirical Two-Tailed Dog Party (Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt – MKKP) applied to the ECtHR as a result of the decisions rendered by the Hungarian National Electoral Commission, the Curia of Hungary and the Constitutional Court, who ruled that a mobile application developed by the party allowing anonymous users to share their invalid votes violated Hungarian election law. By 16 votes to 1, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR ruled that the Hungarian authorities had violated the Article of the ECHR on freedom of expression. According to the ECtHR’s reasoning, the severe uncertainties about the possible consequences of the legal provisions applied by the domestic authorities went beyond what is permissible under Article 10(2) ECHR. The ECtHR has ruled that a judicial interpretation of a law’s rules does not inherently violate the requirement that laws be written in such a way that the legal implications are predictable. However, since the national law in this case provided for a case-by-case limitation on the expression of an opinion on voting, electoral bodies and national courts that interpreted and enforced these rules enjoyed an excessive amount of discretion. In conclusion, the ECtHR found that legislation restricting freedom of expression must be treated more strictly in connection with electoral procedures: it must not be in any way misleading or inconsistent.

Folyóirat/kiadvány címe:

HUNGARIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN LAW

Évszám:

2021

Kötet:

Szám:

Oldalak:

pp. 400-407

ISSN:

2666-2701

Intézmény:

Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem

Kar:

Jog- és Államtudományi Kar

Nyelv:

angol

MTMT rekordazonosító:

32530916

Dátum:

2025. Feb. 03. 10:07

Utolsó módosítás:

2025. Feb. 03. 10:07

URI:

https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/2170

Actions (login required)

Tétel nézet